![]() Normal process (without any usual transformation), define the constraintįor the three timeslice-specific flows according to your formulation, and To in your equation), for a DAYNITE level demand SC. ![]() Technology with just three active timeslice-specific flows (the three flows referred ![]() As far as I can see, it involves a single new (See example in the Appendix if not familiar with TIMES bound parameters)įormulation for the constraint looks very simple indeed, although I am not sure The last two parameters are for the storage flows. Surprised if you have never used ACT_BND, NCAP_BND, CAP_BND, FLO_BND… and STGIN_BND/STGOUT_BND. Any examples you can provide to create a constraint for setting the output of a storage process to zero for a given timeslice would be greatly appreciated.Īttributes are among the most frequently used parameters in TIMES models. Again, I’m not entirely sure how to do this in VEDA. I could just set up storage more conventionally and just bound the outputs to zero for several time slices. So I could set up my constraint as described above, or your 3rd point is a good one as well. ![]() Any help with this or examples of similar constraints would be appreciated. This is a linear constraint, but I’m not sure how to represent these parameters in a VEDA sheet. That is, the amount of cooling that can be taken out of storage in two distinct time slices (ts -1 and ts +1) is equal to the amount of storage added to a given timeslice (ts) and scaled by specific factors (k1 and k2 can be thought of as the inverse of efficiency parameters). The goal is to have a constraint such that SC_in,ts - k1*SC_out,ts-1 - k2*SC_out,ts+1 = 0. My thought is to create a DR process that is a storage device, for example, for space cooling (SC) demand. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |